It’s Samhain…let us consider the other side of the veil
I have been listening to James Taylor’s Hourglass quite a bit lately, probably once every other day. I’ve mentioned before its significance to me as a reminder of A, but the more I listen to it, I find a lot of insight that speaks to me at this time in my life. JT’s an insightful guy; I guess advancing years and kicking your coke habit will do that.
There is no song on the album called “Hourglass,” which I always appreciate. Naming the album after one of the songs on it has always been a lame practice, in my opinion. There’s a bit of mystery when the name is obviously meaningful, but the meaning is not obvious. I like to chew on those mysteries, myself. Subtext is, to me, as important and interesting as the text itself, and often more so.
The songs on the album speak of losses of love, of life, of faith, of hope, and then again, they speak unabashedly of love, life, faith, and hope as givens, sometimes even within the same song. I suppose that is as it should be; there are no absolutes in life, and the duality of all things is more often simultaneous rather than serial.
There are songs that speak directly to the spiritual crisis (in the more neutral “turning point” definition of the word) I have found myself in as a result of A’s passing: my considering very seriously and with cautious yet growing hope the intimation of there being something more to start after the many lives we start and end in this life, the quiet promise and premise that evolution is inevitable and unstoppable, despite the appearance of death. Not everyone believes that, and I understand that. I didn’t believe it either, but I do now.
I considered the “Hourglass” in terms of these songs, and what it might mean. The imagery of the hourglass in reference to life itself is not a new one, but usually is offered in the sense of finity: like sands through the hourglass, so are the days of our lives. Once the sand has run out, it’s run out. That’s it. I would agree that there’s some truth in that simile, but the more I think about it, the more I think it doesn’t go far enough.
For the fact remains that despite the sand having “run out,” it is clearly still all there. Every single grain of it. And I never hear anyone talk about that. The moments of our lives are all together in the top of the hourglass the day we are born, and one by one they slip away, through a passage so narrow that you can barely see through it, and even then only if you are directly on top of it. And yet on the other side is a space as expansive as the one the grain of sand just left. If you happen to be a moment, a grain, in the middle of the pile, you cannot possibly fathom that, beyond that gateway that seems to pull us inexorably ever closer to it, another space exists. But occasionally, the movement of your life will put you on the edge, pressed up against the glass, and you catch a glimpse of another world you previously didn’t know, or denied, existed. And while you may be pulled away again by the vortex, you cannot forget what you have seen.
And at the “end,” when all the sand has run out, does the hourglass get thrown away? No. You flip it over, and you start again. Over and over. Nothing is lost. Time does not end; we just start counting it differently. Life doesn’t end. You start over and over while you’re here, and perhaps once you’re gone as well. Many sages have said that every ending is a beginning, every beginning an end in the making; perhaps it is infinitely truer than we know. Or perhaps others have known, and I am late arriving at the conclusion. But I have met many people who talk about an afterlife as a given tenet of their so-called faith, but when tragedy strikes, the fear in their eyes tells me that they have doubts they don’t want to have. Maybe that’s the difference; they have faith, whereas I feel I’ve been given reason to believe.
I find it difficult to conclude this post, feeling called to put some kind of disclaimer on these words to ease the unease I expect from readers that may actually belong to nobody but me. We don’t talk about this in our practical, concrete world, and even those who say they believe in an afterlife tend to leave it at “they’re in a better place” and don’t really delve publicly into what that means. I have found only a couple people willing to talk to me about such things, when, as a grieving person, they are forefront in my mind. There is as much mysticism in religion as any other tradition, but that mystery still seems taboo. Even a very faithful friend with whom I’ve been sharing these evolving thoughts seems willing to go no further than some version of “Well, of course.” This does me no good as I try to make sense of the inexplicable yet undeniable. I don’t know if it’s because it’s too personal, or too uncertain. I suspect it might be a combination of both.
If it is the truth, you’d think people would talk about it as freely and unselfconciously as they do the truth of rising gas prices. If it is false, you’d think people would debunk it freely and vociferously as they do the B.S. that comes out of Washington, D.C. Instead, it is relegated to the province of the New Age freaks and the Jesus freaks, and the professional debunkers and disbelievers; there seems to be no one willing to rationally discuss the irrational. But just because something’s irrational doesn’t mean it’s wrong; the numinous may just require another means of understanding. Reason and mystery do not seem to me incompatible; rather, I would argue that to truly understand our experiences requires a healthy respect and critical consideration of both.


